Monday, March 14, 2011

Pinnacle Pctv 3010ix Linux Driver

paradise L'augment dels populism; l'municipal eclosió

(Article extraído Angel's blog Solé . An analysis of the increases on populismos)

read between concerned and fun the last blog entry Sure, Parera, Nazis and the Great White on presentation to the city of freaks Republican Social Movement (MSR). This is linked with the news of the presentation, also in Calafell, Democratic Via (VIA), as well as the known Platform for Catalonia (PXC). Not to mention ADMC, UAM, SI, Rally, Let us go JMRC, IAS (Rion), etc. ...

Although distinct, no longer the expression of one thing: The populism. Now I'll take a snapshot of these parties, which is usually always the same: 1 .-

single message: They tend to rely on one key idea. And repeat until satiety, online marketing and modern USP (Unique Selling Proposition), but very exaggerated. All identify a single enemy or problem: The immigration the capitalism , large parties, the parties do not "municipal" ...

2 .- Lack of Program: How only focus on one message (and capture the Military through this) have made quite a speech around a single subject but are unable to reason properly the remaining problems. For example, VIA will discuss much about immigration, but have no clue about new systems of government on infrastructure on the municipal reality. ..

3 .- partial knowledge of reality : I mean the reality that surround the future team of municipal government. This could be divided into 2 subgroups:

a) The alleged " municipal ": they know quite a few problems in the municipality, but not usually respond appropriately to issues of local, provincial or regional level. And make no mistake, the future government team should also know about these issues.

b) populist ideology (from left or right): They know quite a few of the state or regional problem, but quite unaware of municipal problems, their reality, and if you know something, they usually focus in one subject (as mentioned above). 4 .-

leave from nothing: always have a few months of the elections (4 or 3 months) and want to monopolize the work done by others are either parties or civil society. The municipal by internal divisions, for pure quest for power. The ideology, party decisions to respond to national or regional level and often are not people of their own municipality or not they have ever seen.

5 .- On the Internet, multicomptes. We have already seen UAM, but I smell the multitude of anonymous who responded on the post Via Democratic, and I have seen many forums, color they are. How are few, digitally multiplied by a wave of sound mind. 6 .- High

Expiration: And we'll see, but usually only lasts a choice, and the failure to dissolve or go on to form new groups, or merge to be divided into fights Cainites the next elections ... or go to the absolute exclusion (eg MSR) See Wikipedia ... find examples of solutions with Rally (ERC now want to go again) and probably some members face the next regional, then again ... so long ERC. Already edge, but surely if NIC, ADMC, etc ... not UAM get anything, or attaches or go in other political formations. Do not be avoided, many do not like working. 7 .-

promise of paradise, especially in ideology: If you give me the power, all the evils of the world ends, that is, if there immigrans there will be no crisis if no capitalism, we live in an earthly paradise.

8 .- For the moment, 4 cats per game.

As the fighting populism? There are 3 ways to do, already have been tested across Europe:

  • ignore them, act as if there were no in order not to enter the political game
  • you continue the game: cede their discussion, they make us to discuss your program (as PXC).
  • combat : Proposing an alternative model of face to face to face against the populist dogma (immigration, capitalism and stablishment ).

All these tracks, as mentioned, have been tested, but only the latter has taken effect. The paradigmatic case is the Patrik Janssens, who was faced with the populist Vlaams Beelang backing a campaign of direct communication with citizens and enforntant himself face to VB arguments against you. Not to avoid racist arguments nor despised, fighting, making clear the lack of arguments and disconnection with the municipality.

Well, I think this is the way we should go against the populist Calafell. Make clear that they do not know, make clear that they have reached only three months of the elections to seek power, and ls evident that his arguments do not stand anywhere .

0 comments:

Post a Comment